Please visit our TOP-TWENTY-FIVE ISLAMIPEDIA™ Webpages

[1] ISLAMIPEDIA™ Holy Quran Quotes About JESUS CHRIST, the MESSIAH!


[3] ISLAMIPEDIA™ Do Islam, Judaism, and Christianity All Teach Monotheism?

[4] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - KORAN, “HOLY QUR’AN” The Muslim American Authorized-Version, SURAH-1

[5] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - ISLAMIC PRAYER “SALAH” – Muslim Prayer Principles:

[6] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - ISLAMIC HADITHS, Defined and Explained:

[7] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Prophet Mohammad, His Last Teaching:

[8] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - “The TRUTH of the SWORD” by Ayatollah Khomeini!

[9] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Ayatollah Khomeini, Brief-Bio;

[10] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - The Grand Ayatollah Khomeini: His Beliefs of Theocratic Governing;

[11] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - The Grand Ayatollah Khomeini, Islamic-Hero

[12] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Quotes Against USA and Israel by MAHMOUD-AHMADINEJAD:


[14] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Quotes Against USA by OSAMA bin LADEN

[15] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Powerful Modern Muslim Quotes Against USA, Israel & The West

[16] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Islam for Dummies! The Very Basics


[18] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - What do Muslims, Christians and Jews have in Common?

[19] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Will Islam Conquer the USA in a Generation?

[20] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Do Muslims love Jesus as much as Christians Do?

[21] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - A “Seeking Soul” Explores Islam

[22] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Web’s Most Comprehensive Islamic-Muslim Site:

[23] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Report on Muslims Converting to Christianity: IS THIS TRUE?

[24] ISLAMIPEDIA™ - Why Muslims REJECT Apostle Paul: His Revelation v. Prophet-Mohammad’s




Ground Mosque Imam;

Leader of the Ground Mosque Memorial Monument in New York;

"Imam Accuses the USA as being Worse Killers than "9-11" Attackers;


Will Muslims take over USA and Establish “Sharia Law?”

Only God truly knows the answer to that question. However, the extremely sad truth is – for this writer as a Bible Christian – as follows:

**Many of the things the Muslims DESPISE about the USA, we Bible Christians despise as well!

Consider an “Americanized Version of Isaiah 1:1-4 where God gives an INTRO to Israel, explaining why He was going to destroy them as a nation:

    "O Ye Sinful Americans: a people legalizing sin instead of outlawing sin as I have Commanded!

    You have legalized that which I have forbidden: drunkeness, abortion, gambling, pornography, pornographic movies and Hollywood, 'No-fault-Divorce', adultery and fornication, and even legalized blasphemy;

    At every level of your society, My 'Name', My 'Word', My 'Day' (The Sabbath), My 'Church', My 'Ministers', My 'People' and 'MY SON' - are Blasphemed! My Christians simply turn a 'Deaf Ear' to this profanity';

    All the while turning a blind eye to near-nudity, nearly-legal prostitution, rampant drug usage, and under-aged-sexual activity and abortion (not to mention greed, pride, materialism, secularism, evolutionism and so much more . . .)

    And now - you are even embracing Sodomy and same-sex-marriage - WELL KNOWING My Destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah!

      Do you see why I AM provoked to anger with you?

    Sadly, you are raising your children to be completely corrupted. [America] You have forsaken My Ways, the Ways of your Founding Fathers, and therefore, your whole nation is gone away backward."

Isaiah goes on in chapter three to describe in detail the blatant sexuality of Israel’s women: (Isaiah 3.16 begins: “Because the daughters of Zion… with wanton eyes…their secret parts…” and on it goes for 10 more verses.

Thus God explained that because the men of Israel allowed – and even encouraged - their wives and daughters to look like, talk like, act like and dress like, harlots; and allowed their Children to grow up uncorrected and unrestrained, that God would punish them by doing the following:

    >> Allow Children to oppress them (Crime rampant in the streets!)

    >> Allow women to Rule over them, (disdaining and disrespecting the men who have fought every war, manned every police and sheriff’s department, shedding their blood and risking their lives to keep them safe! (See Isaiah 3:12)

    >> That the men would then fall by the sword (See Isaiah 3:26)

If Muslims took over USA, most sin would be stopped immediately!

Sadly, when we Americans are fighting for ‘the American way of life’ – we are fighting for:

    >> The 'Right to Sin',

    >> The 'Right to Practice Abomination',

    >> The 'Right to Blaspheme'!"

    >>> Is this all the American way of life is about!

If the Muslims took over the USA, the sin and the blaspheming would end immediately. There would be no more drunkeness and drug addiction, and same-sex marriage and blatant homosexuality would become “a dead issue” in American politics.

Isn’t it terribly sad, for us American Christians (too weak and wimpy to stop any sin!) to think that our beloved American homeland may need conquered by Muslims . . .JUST to “STOP THE LEGALIZED SINS and ABOMINATIONS?"

It may well be true! It may very well be true!

Islam! Jihad! Global Caliphate!

Ground-Zero Mosque Leader, "Imam" Feisal Abdul Rauf

New audio has surfaced of the imam behind the controversial mosque near Ground Zero allegedly telling an audience overseas that the United States has been far more deadly than al-Qaeda.

"Imam" Feisal Abdul Rauf QUOTES:

"We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al-Qaeda has on its hands of innocent non Muslims,"

Feisal Abdul Rauf said at a 2005 lecture sponsored by the University of South Australia. After discussing the U.S.-led sanctions against Iraq under Saddam Hussein, Rauf went on to argue that America is to blame for its testy relationship with Islamic countries.

"Imam" Feisal Abdul Rauf QUOTES:

"What complicates the discussion, intra-Islamically, is the fact that the West has not been cognizant and has not addressed the issues of its own contribution to much injustice in the Arab and Muslim world."

The audio was uncovered by blogger Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs.

Imam Rauf and the ‘One State Solution’ for the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict

Understandably, Feisal Rauf’s assertion that the U.S. has more innocent blood on its hands than does al-Qaeda is getting lots of attention (see, e.g., Keep America Safe). Something else caught my eye, though. Way down toward the end of the transcript, we find him endorsing the “one-state solution” for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict (my italics):

We now have post-Zionism movements in Israel. We have a very broad spectrum of people in Israel who regard Israel as a nation state, as a secular state, as a multicultural state. The very fabric and demographic, and I would say even identity, of Israel has shifted enormously in the last 60 years since its founding. . . .

The differences, perhaps, may lie on whether the solution lies in the two-state solution or in a one-state solution. I believe that you had someone here recently who spoke about having a “one land and two peoples” solution to Israel. And I personally — my own personal analysis tells me that a one-state solution is a more coherent one than a two-state solution.

This is the “solution to Israel” preferred by the Muslim Brotherhood and the anti-Israel Left.

For the Islamists, the terror campaign of Hamas (which is the Muslim Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch) is a method of keeping up the pressure. It is not something they believe will, by itself, destroy Israel.

Terrorism is a means to an end, not an end in and of itself. The end in question here is the destruction of Israel as a Jewish state. Hamas is pledged to use violent jihad, but the important thing is accomplishing the mission, not how it is accomplished.

As I’ve pointed out before (I’ve even written a book about it), the Brotherhood and al-Qaeda are after the same bottom line: Islamist rule. The Brotherhood, however, distinguishes itself by being willing to work through available political and legal processes. Al-Qaeda, by contrast, rejects this, reasoning that this approach legitimizes non-sharia processes and, in any event, takes too long.

The terrorism and non-terrorism methods of advancing the sharia agenda are far from mutually exclusive; in fact, they reinforce one another. And the non-terrorism approach has, for practitioners, the added advantage that Western opinion elites will laud them as “moderates” even though their agenda is the very opposite of moderate.

For the Brotherhood, Hamas’s jihad (and Fatah’s terrorism, and Israel’s responses) create international pressure for a political solution.

In that political solution, the idea is to turn the West’s democracy infatuation and rhetoric against Israel, so that Israel is browbeaten into putting its character as a Jewish state up for a democratic vote. In the interim, the Arab population in Israel (now over a million) is swelling, and Palestinians insist on the “right of return” as part of any political settlement.

Between this push for ever-higher Palestinian numbers in Israel and support from secular Israeli Jews who would be willing to trade Israel’s Jewish identity for “peace,” the Brotherhood is moving toward what it expects will be an electoral majority.

The idea is that once Israel’s status as a Jewish state is delegitimized and democratically overturned, the Palestinian territories can be formally joined to Israel, and it will soon become a Palestinian Islamic state — at which point there will be no further need for democracy. That’s the one-state political solution. It just happens to be the same as Hamas’s terrorist solution: No more Israel.

For anyone who has studied how the Brotherhood operates, taken note of Rauf’s Brotherhood associations, and listened to the imam’s slippery answers to simple questions such as Do you believe Hamas is a terrorist organization?, none of this is surprising.

But it does raise a question for the Obama administration as it pressures Israel to return to the negotiating table:

    If the official policy of the United States is that Hamas is a terrorist organization and that the solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “two states living side-by-side in peace;”

    how can the State Department be using, for diplomatic missions to Arab states, an emissary who doesn’t believe Hamas is a terrorist organization and who favors a one-state solution in which the Jewish state is disappeared?